The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology recently tackled some familiar questions, such as how to boost the number of students in technical fields and how to encourage more partnerships between colleges and the private sector. But not all of their answers fell neatly in line with conventional wisdom.
Michael S. Teitelbaum, a demographer at the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, looked at what he called five “mysteries” of the STEM work force issue. For example, why do employers claim a shortage of qualified STEM graduates while prospects for Ph.D.s remain “poor"? Why do retention and completion rates for STEM fields remain low compared with students’ aspirations? Why is there a “serious” funding crisis at the National Institutes of Health after its budget doubled from 1998 to 2003?
Read the article on insidehighered.com
Whoa! Innovation at the USPTO?
Backlogs at the USPTO are being dealt with using a creative strategy, the Peer-to-Patent project, that allows inventors to publish patent applications on the Web for comment by experts with relevant expertise. This is a creative way to uncover "prior art" and, thereby, assist patent examiners in assessing applications. In other words, this is a triage system to help reduce the number of patents that are not novel. This peer review also may reduce the number of infringement law suits currently clogging the courts.
Now, if only we can get the FDA to think outside the box in order to accelerate NDAs while maintaining high standards of safety.
Read the story about the Peer-to-Patent project in the Chicago Tribune.
Posted by Steven S. Clark, PhD on September 21, 2008 at 02:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This | Save to del.icio.us